Tamron AF 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 Di-II SP LD Aspherical (IF) Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras | 
 enlarge | Brand: Tamron
Category: Photography
List Price: $899.99
Buy New: $525.00 (On sale from $549.89)
You Save: $24.89 (5%)
New (5) Used (3) from $450.00
Rating:  5 reviews
Media: Electronics
Optical Zoom: 1.7
Maximum Focal Length: 18
Minimum Focal Length: 11
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.3
Dimensions (in): 5.9 x 5.4 x 4.8
Warranty: 6 years warranty
MPN: AF13C-700
Model: AF13C-700
UPC: 725211137016
EAN: 0725211137016
ASIN: B0007WK8NU
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | 0.25m (9.8 inch) Minimum Focus Distance | | • | Filter Diameter - 77 | | • | Diameter x Length - 83.2mm x 78.6mm (3.3 x 3.1 inch) | | • | Weight - 355 grams (12.5 ounces) | | • | Accessory Flower shaped lens hood |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
This super wide-angle zoom lens is designed for exclusive use with digital SLR cameras using a sensor smaller than full-size format. The lens provides an extended focal length of 17mm (when converted to full-size format), the desired length for todays most advanced, professional photographers using digital SLRs. The lens features a completely new optical system designed for optimal performance with digital SLR cameras.An element of both HID (High Index High Dispersion) and LD (Low Dispersion) glass are used to minimize on-axis and lateral chromatic aberrations. In addition, one high precision, large clear aperture, glass-molded aspherical element and two hybrid aspherical elements are used to compensate for spherical and chromatic aberrations and distortion, to achieve outstanding optical quality.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Not bad, could be better August 26, 2008
Pros: It's really cool what you can do with this lens. The special effects at close range are very intriguing, and for capturing landscapes, home interiors, etc. it really does the job well. For that reason, it's very handy to have.
Cons: On my Canon 30D, the lens is not quite as sharp as my kit lens (28-135mm). It's not bad, especially on a tripod, but it could be better. I also get some purple fringes on back-lit edges. There seems to be a lot of contrast, making it hard to get the right exposure - pictures tend to be very overexposed and underexposed in a single shot. These problems can be remedied with software, and the ability to do what it does makes up for the disadvantages somewhat, but you do notice the quality difference.
All in all, I like using the lens. I'm glad I have it because of what I can do with it. Make no mistake, the quality isn't as good as my Canon lens, and if I had a higher budget, I might try something else.
I like it February 2, 2008
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I'm not sure how I would rate the value if I had to pay the normal retail price for this lens, but I got a used one for $350 and I consider it a terrific value. Get consistently good shots with it, even at 11mm using a polarizer -- much less vignetting than I expected. The lens is really small and light for something of this sort.
Tamron 11-18 November 10, 2006
11 out of 11 found this review helpful
I did a lot of research prior to buying this lens....comparing it to other wide angles etc. It got good ratings and I agree. I use it with my Canon 20D and it performs well. Pics are clean with no major noticable abberations. You can get a somewhat cool "fisheye" effect at the low end without having to buy an expensive fisheye lens. Use a lens hood because there is the potential for a lot of flare typical for this lens class. For the pro-sumer like me....it does the job at a lower price than it's competitors. Amazon was fine.....best price with no problems with shipping etc/.
So-so performance from an (relatively) expensive lens October 12, 2006
9 out of 11 found this review helpful
I've been playing with this lens attached to my EOS 400D for couple of weeks now and I'm affraid it's not living up to my expectations, or it's relatively high price. Out of all the third party contenders (Tamron, Sigma & Tokina), this one is the most expensive, about $100 more than Tokina, yet it has the most limited zoom range, but most importantly, it's way too soft. Maybe I just have a bad copy, but in that case, for the price the QC should be better. At 18mm, it's marginally better than the 18-55 Canon kit lens, but then again, I don't need it for 18mm. Color rendition is OK and with some post-processing it makes acceptable 8x10 prints, but I just can't get over the price difference, so I'm returning it and trying my luck with Tokina 12-24...
 A Good Wide Angle Lens July 3, 2005
27 out of 37 found this review helpful
This lens seems to perform well and I have attached it to a Rebel 350 XT. Pictures so far look great. Really wide angle, possibly more than I really need, but it's fun to have. I am sure that a Canon lens is better, but would cost 2 to 3 times as much. The only problem I have had so far is at the widest angle indoors, the lens will cause a shadow when you use the flash on the camera.
|
|
|
